Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > The Campfire

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov 02, 2006, 08:01 PM // 20:01   #1
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Lordhelmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: Sentients of Shadow (noir)
Profession: Me/E
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Nerf coming to Searing Flames?

I'm gonna be sad next update T_T. This skill is just so good... I hope they don't overkill it to the point where it's useless. I'm impressed with NF though, Anet has done a complete 180 with elementalists and added some very good balancing skills like liquid flame and flame djinn's haste.
Lordhelmos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 02, 2006, 09:36 PM // 21:36   #2
Jungle Guide
 
Mouse at Large's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scotland
Guild: Fuzzy Physics Institute
Profession: E/
Default

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10069271

Doesn't seem to be too much of a groundswell.....
Mouse at Large is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 08, 2006, 04:53 AM // 04:53   #3
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Kidney Licker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe Server
Default

I just ran into it in RA and was surprised at the recharge time of 2 secs.

I created an ele and went into RA and it's a nice skill. Just spam over and over with glowing gaze and another one occasionally, don't need to think too hard, just point and click. Nice large aoe, you mow every1 down pretty efficently. 100% win against groups without a monk.
Kidney Licker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 08, 2006, 04:58 AM // 04:58   #4
(屮ಠ益ಠ)屮
 
LightningHell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Guild: Guildless
Profession: Mo/
Default

I don't think it'll be nerfed. Paras will probably be, though.
LightningHell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 12:27 AM // 00:27   #5
Desert Nomad
 
Sarevok Thordin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scotland
Profession: W/N
Default

Oh this skill will receive a HUGE nerf, either searing or Gaze will get a SWIFT nerf.

This actually beats touch rangers for abusability, unless you go E/Me with Mantra of flame and that anti-set on fire skill, you are in trouble no matter what you are.
Sarevok Thordin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 12:37 AM // 00:37   #6
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Tobias Funke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: The Following of Xanthar
Profession: Me/N
Default

Throw steam in there and you won't ever get hit with damage either.
Tobias Funke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 12:40 AM // 00:40   #7
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Vermilion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarevok Thordin
This actually beats touch rangers for abusability, unless you go E/Me with Mantra of flame and that anti-set on fire skill, you are in trouble no matter what you are.
Except that SF eles are actually useful outside RA.

Meh, you can debate whether it needs a change or not, but Im pretty sure it will be nerfed regardless, as Anet will also nerf things due to overuse too.
Vermilion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 07:41 AM // 07:41   #8
Furnace Stoker
 
Dr Strangelove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wasting away again in Margaritaville
Guild: [HOTR]
Default

I hope they aren't nerfed, the damage they do when left to their own devices is comparable to a warrior raging in your face with no counters. They're easy as heck to shut down, a ranger or a mesmer can shutdown one of them with his eyes closed. Unfortunately, people still refuse to bring counters to them and continure on bringing melee counters and complaining when they get killed by elemental damage. I say keep it as is and buff all the other elemental skills so eles can provide viable pressure.
Dr Strangelove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 07:45 AM // 07:45   #9
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Birmingham, England
Guild: Build Wars [gg]
Profession: Me/
Default

It is very easy to counter. I was playing with a Ranger (natural elemental resistance) with the anti-fire damage insignia on armor. SF did about 43 damage tops. It also gives monks a chance to use Mantra of Flame.
ValidusMonachus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 12:46 PM // 12:46   #10
Wilds Pathfinder
 
TGgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: Flying Gophers
Profession: Rt/P
Default

My personal favorite things against it are...distracting shot. Diversion.

Any time there's a spammer, they will get pwned by these two skills.
TGgold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 01:01 PM // 13:01   #11
(屮ಠ益ಠ)屮
 
LightningHell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Guild: Guildless
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ValidusMonachus
It is very easy to counter. I was playing with a Ranger (natural elemental resistance) with the anti-fire damage insignia on armor. SF did about 43 damage tops. It also gives monks a chance to use Mantra of Flame.
These counters are, however, very unreliable. Diversion/Distracting Shot = win. (Unreliable meaning it's completely and utterly useless vs every other build.)
__________________
LightningHell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 02:09 PM // 14:09   #12
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Default

If the burning was reduced from 7 seconds to 5 seconds at 16 fire that might be enough to peg it back a bit without overdoing it.
BoredJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 07:17 AM // 07:17   #13
Krytan Explorer
 
Hyprodimus Prime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Guild: Sorrow Masters
Profession: E/
Default

What about frigid armor?
Hyprodimus Prime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 07:26 AM // 07:26   #14
Forge Runner
 
Poison Ivy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto
Guild: Hopping
Profession: Mo/A
Default

Random note of advice: When you go in HA, have everyone take Mantra of Flame, 4/5 of the parties are running Searing Flames....
Poison Ivy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 11:10 AM // 11:10   #15
Krytan Explorer
 
stueyman2099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Clan W A S D [WASD]
Profession: W/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poison Ivy
Random note of advice: When you go in HA, have everyone take Mantra of Flame, 4/5 of the parties are running Searing Flames....
ward against harm works wonders as well
stueyman2099 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 11:34 AM // 11:34   #16
Grindin'
 
Thom Bangalter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MO
Profession: E/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyprodimus Prime
What about frigid armor?
Any time you bring a skill that is incredibly limited except vs one skill is a waste of a skill slot, especially when it's effect is as limited as frigid armor.

General anti-spam skills such as diversion work well against the skill, and mantra of flame is really good, because it's effects are far superior to frigid armor.

Also, as I noted in a thread in the HA or GVG folder (this skill is getting talked about everywhere) extinguish with a modest 7 or 8 in prot is another nice skill to bring.

Both monks with Mantra of flame+extinguish worked really well vs a team, but the guild was running spike...I don't know how a balanced would fare as I haven't been on much for GvG the past few days.
Thom Bangalter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 04:28 PM // 16:28   #17
Wilds Pathfinder
 
frojack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, UK
Guild: Rite Of Passage [RP]
Profession: E/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom Bangalter
Any time you bring a skill that is incredibly limited except vs one skill is a waste of a skill slot, especially when it's effect is as limited as frigid armor.

General anti-spam skills such as diversion work well against the skill, and mantra of flame is really good, because it's effects are far superior to frigid armor.

Also, as I noted in a thread in the HA or GVG folder (this skill is getting talked about everywhere) extinguish with a modest 7 or 8 in prot is another nice skill to bring.

Both monks with Mantra of flame+extinguish worked really well vs a team, but the guild was running spike...I don't know how a balanced would fare as I haven't been on much for GvG the past few days.
I wouldn't call 40+ armour vs. physical limited. However I do suppose it depends on your build and whether or not you plan to use water. Searing Flames is indeed powerful. Probably doesn't need a nerf, but it seems that in situations like this, the community is what affects Anet's decisions on skills. If it gets used excessively, It will probably be adjusted somehow.
frojack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2006, 07:48 AM // 07:48   #18
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Arcador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: --
Profession: R/N
Default

Well even it does not deliver that much devastation this skill brings an extream pressure.

At the start of the week most of the teams were using the SF, GG, LF build...but now at the and of the week I see a TWO copies of it.

It requires a little tune down, not be spammed that easily (i.e. recharge increase). On the Dual SF buillds the enemy team mostly dies slowly by pressure - a pressure that requires a heavy condition or hex build. Even bringing an extinguish user won't help you much either - it's spam rate is unmatched.
We manage to beat such teams, but the only reason for that is that they do some major mistakes(we are noobs lol ) (underestimating falling enemies), otherwise it is a little nightmare - our hp never gets bigger than 60% (and that is thanks to the extingish, heal party spamers). On the top pvp battles you see how the other team fail to stop the heavy hp degen+112 every ~4 secs. It is somekind of stupid to watch good team to try some inhuman maneurability and skill usage and still be melt down by 2 eles which's monitor goes - SF, GG, SF, LF,SF, GG, SF, LF.... Even bringing armor vs fire wont' save you much since the damage comes from the massive burning effect and a little by the actuall damage.
So if you somehow manage to distract or divert the skill - it is good, but otherwise it is too cheap for 1 skill to bring so much pressure.

As an elementalist myself I suggest increased recharge by 4 secs.
Arcador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2006, 08:07 AM // 08:07   #19
(屮ಠ益ಠ)屮
 
LightningHell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Guild: Guildless
Profession: Mo/
Default

Not to be spammed so easily means "make-it-so-everybody-uses-Prodigy-again". Unless it's like a...1 second increase.
__________________
LightningHell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2006, 08:58 AM // 08:58   #20
Core Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcador
As an elementalist myself I suggest increased recharge by 4 secs.
Increased recharge by 4 secs? Are you high? Increasing recharge by 4 secs means the skill has a recharge of 6 secs and considering burning at 16 attribute only lasts 7 secs and SF has a 1 sec cast, what would be the point of the skill then? I really don't want to see eles return to bareing their boobs to blind warrs again. Aren't people sick of that metagame yet?
trialist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 PM // 23:17.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("